No. I legitimately just watched it all the way up to the end. I'm about to see the finale again. It did not age poorly. People just assume because "government bad" and having the main characters want to be an active part of that system that it will age poorly. I mean, the show literally has the government trying to ban child's sodas, not sodas for children, but a soda the size of a child if the child were in liquid form. It's just a positive show all around and ridiculous show all around.
Especially when her partner just died and Michael Lewis and John Lee Hancock would also be responsible
The politics of Parks definitely represent a sunnier, Obama era that don’t age well when you consider all the not-great things Obama did or maybe didn’t do. But besides some cast members featured previously in this thread, I think it aged better than most.
I mean, if it were like the West Wing and trying to be serious I could understand that, but it's just a show about trying to make their community and subsequently the country better through local politics and as much as it is a liberal fantasy, I don't think it's painting things in a way that makes you feel squirmy 10 years later or whatever.
Y’know, it might be practical to eventually move this conversation to, like, the unpopular opinions thread or something, lol.
I was rewatching parks a few months ago but gave up around the 4th season mark, don't think it aged particularly poorly but I found the same of the schtick a bit more grating this time around. I think prime Community and It's Always Sunny are the only sitcoms I'd still really go to bat for.
Anyways, let's take the convo over to here: https://forum.chorus.fm/threads/unpopular-entertainment-opinions.5298
YouTube star loses sponsor after saying she wants wine expert 'dead' It’s giving James Corden at Balthazar. Why do celebrities think they can just treat people doing their jobs however they want because they (the celebrity) are not getting exactly what they want how they want it at all times? Edit to add: