This article has been imported from chorus.fm for discussion. All of the forum rules still apply. Ever wonder? How To Talk About Art History has the answer. Firstly, they’re flaccid. If you compare their size to most flaccid male penises, they are actually not significantly smaller than real-life penises tend to be. Secondly, cultural values about male beauty were completely different back then. Today, big penises are seen as valuable and manly, but back then, most evidence points to the fact that small penises were considered better than big ones The More You Know™ Expand - View Original
I mean if you take into account that David is over 20 feet tall, his penis isn't actually that small...only proportionally... I'll just leave this here in case anyone needs something to bandage their fragile masculinity.
I actually have wondered this. And I honestly thought it was because putting really small penises on art might make women think that smaller size was the average size and thus, guys would seem bigger. Apparently I was way off, and a big weirdo for really thinking that much into it
Now this is an article I signed up for!! I saw a statue in Florence near the fake David one where the guy was tea bagging his buddy
When you were in Florence, did you get a chance to look at Perseus? He was right outside the Accademia to the right of the fake David.
I just googled it. I think I may have seen it. But it doesn't appear in any photos I took. And it's very cool so I would've taken pic I'll post them below
Read this as "old statuses" the first four time and couldn't, for the life of me, figure out what it was supposed to mean.
Love the pics. I only ask if you saw Perseus because when I was in Florence I took this picture. I dunno about you, but to me it looks like fake David is throwing some serious shade