Remove ads, unlock a dark mode theme, and get other perks by upgrading your account. Experience the website the way it's meant to be.

The Mummy (Alex Kurtzman, June 9th, 2017) Movie • Page 4

Discussion in 'Entertainment Forum' started by Henry, Dec 1, 2016.

  1. airik625

    we've seen the shadow of the axe before Supporter

    "Worst Tom Cruise movie ever"
     
  2. Henry

    Moderator Moderator

    down to 21% on RT
     
  3. This was entertaining blockbuster garb. I generally enjoy Tom Cruise in anything I see him in, but I feel like this movie would've been more fun to watch if Jake Johnson had the lead role.
     
  4. Zilla

    Prestigious Supporter

    That's what I thought. Tom Cruise felt miscast in this. When Russell Crowe said how Cruise was a much younger man in the movie, I'm like "Dude, you're like a year younger than him."
     
  5. CarpetElf

    chorus's #3 oklahoma city comets fan Prestigious

    Nah. Tom Cruise has been 39 for a decade. Russell Crowe has been 45 for as long as I can remember.
     
    Davjs, fenway89, Zilla and 2 others like this.
  6. Henry

    Moderator Moderator

    Estimates between $29-32 million for the weekend. Still gonna be second to WW.
     
    imthesheriff and popdisaster00 like this.
  7. CoffeeEyes17

    Reclusive-aggressive Prestigious

    this was.....wow. they really think THIS is going to kick off the "Dark Universe" project? Geez, it was just like a dumb action movie and the attempts to set up this "universe" felt so unoriginal.

    I really, really, REALLY love the old Universal Monster films, from Hunchback all the way to The Brute Man, so I was really interested in this after hearing rumbles of this idea since like 2010. I hope they arent all just dumb action movies, thats kinda missing the point of having the monsters and the secondary characters. Maybe this will be a wake-up call and whoevers next will do a better job. Frankly it seems kinda redundant since the old Universal Monsters films were clearly in the same universe and crossed over with each other so why try and do it again? Those movies are still great.
     
    fenway89 likes this.
  8. CoffeeEyes17

    Reclusive-aggressive Prestigious

    Speaking of League Of Extraordinary Gentlemen what if they tied that into this universe as well and made the League the "heroes" so to speak? Maybe that could be neat. Theyre planning on bringing Van Helsing into the mix and theyve already got The Invisible Man and Dr Jekyll/Mr Hyde so the seeds are there.

    its sad that thinking about what this cinematic universe could be is far more exciting than this movie was
     
    coleslawed likes this.
  9. oakhurst

    Trusted Supporter

    I really liked this. I like cinematic universes and I'm glad they used this to basically be Part 1 of the Dark Universe instead of straying away from it. Also it's already made $150 million the weekend in foreign territories. With $30 million in US that's a $180 worldwide opening weekend with a $125 million budget. That's not that bad.
     
  10. Full Effect Ed

    ...In F*cking Full Effect Prestigious

    That's not counting P&A, I heard the total budget was closer to $300 mil. Not a good opening weekend but it's Universal so they're probably just happy to be breaking even when it's all said and done. I don't see this effecting the Dark Universe
     
  11. oakhurst

    Trusted Supporter

    Yeah it's not going to make much above the budget and all of the marketing, but it's not going to be a bomb unless the foreign box office drops dramatically. I think it would be making more in the US if it was released in October but oh well.
     
  12. oakhurst

    Trusted Supporter

    Biggest worldwide opening for a Tom Cruise film.
     
    popdisaster00 likes this.
  13. imthegrimace

    Prestigious Supporter

    That's crazy to me.
     
    Aaron Mook likes this.
  14. thedrudo

    Trusted Prestigious

    As much as I didn't like this, I'm still interested in what the future of the DU holds.
     
  15. thedrudo

    Trusted Prestigious

    Aaron Mook likes this.
  16. CoffeeEyes17

    Reclusive-aggressive Prestigious

    Maybe the next one will be better as a movie. Supposedly it's Bride Of Frankenstein? Seems odd to introduce her before Frankensteins Monster but w/e as long as she has her iconic hair I'm down for whatever, she's probably my favorite of the classic monsters.

    Am I the only one that's kinda side-eying casting Johnny Depp, who's been accused of abuse and made some tactless rape jokes, playing The Invisible Man who, if they're going with the book version, is a woman abuser and rapist? That just seems.....very very strange.
     
    iCarly Rae Jepsen likes this.
  17. iCarly Rae Jepsen

    run away with me Platinum

    I guess we don't really need an origin story for Frankenstein's monster, we know who he is
    Bill Condon is also directing it and he did Gods and Monsters which makes me excited

    I'm not familiar with The Invisible Man but Johnny Depp is a POS, interesting how he's gone from someone I wanted to see movies for to someone I try to avoid, unless it's an ensemble like Murder On The Orient Express
     
    awakeohsleeper and CoffeeEyes17 like this.
  18. Zilla

    Prestigious Supporter

    Yeah, between Johnny Depp being in the next "Fantastic Beasts" and "Invisibles man," these are two bland franchises that are only diluted more with Depp's presence.
     
    CoffeeEyes17 likes this.
  19. oakhurst

    Trusted Supporter

  20. CoffeeEyes17

    Reclusive-aggressive Prestigious

    It's weird that Dr Jekyll is the "Nick Fury" of this universe and it's strange what his plan is. It's like he's making monsters to fight monsters that wouldn't have been made if he didn't make monsters? Idk it's just such a strange way to basically set up what's going to be a kinda redundant idea
     
    RyanPm40 likes this.
  21. Henry

    Moderator Moderator

     
    CoffeeEyes17 likes this.
  22. CoffeeEyes17

    Reclusive-aggressive Prestigious

    Ayyyy the RedLetterMedia guys are great. Mike has some of the best delivery and awkward timing
     
  23. Jake Gyllenhaal

    Wookie of the Year Supporter

    Have you seen Rock of Ages?
     
  24. thedrudo

    Trusted Prestigious

  25. Henry

    Moderator Moderator

    Very curious to see the international drop off for this. It's estimated that the film cost around $200 mil with the ads and what not. It's at $172 worldwide right now. It'll obviously recoup, but I don't know that it will have Universal double back a little bit. I think a fair estimate might be around $250 at the end of its run.