I thought it was just me.... I couldn't understand shit even with my good headphones on. I'm very glad that wasn't in the movie. Felt way too long and this movie def didn't need an extra 5 minutes.
That is a hell of a take on the character. Somewhere between Ledger and Arkham. It would have ruined the movie for me and I wish they had cut all of it - not because it’s bad. It’s so good, to me, that it would have ruined the rest of the film.
I actually wish they’d put that scene in the movie — exploring Arkham and visiting Joker would’ve been a lot more interesting of a side-mission than the 15-20 minutes of mobster exposition we got IMO. And in a movie aping Fincher it would’ve been cool to have the “detective talks to a psychopath to understand the psychopath he’s hunting” homage in there. Don’t even think this scene would feel like a cheap trick in the context of the movie either. Putting him at the end was always going to feel like “studio-requested sequel set-up”, regardless of Reeves’ intentions. This scene in the middle of the film would’ve felt more like “the Joker exists in this world and obviously will be back, but we’re not dangling it like a carrot at the end because we know you dummies will eat it up.” As far as the character itself, I’m on board. I’m not like “holy fuck now I really need to see a sequel with this Joker”, but I trust Reeves and Keoghan to do something awesome with it. I kinda dig the whole approach of Batman having a previous relationship with Joker after having caught him in their early hero/villain days.