Discussion in 'Polls Forum' started by Dominick, Sep 16, 2016.
For what it's worth, I like mayo as well.
Why can't I vote both yes and socialism
Overrated and untalented. Jesse Lacey would preemptively be banned from the site. There are specific tests in place to ensure that. For example, we have tests that allow us to understand the rate at which any given person would borrow from Morrissey.
You don't have to be the model minority in this thread, Nate.
Ok you have my support.
Hey man. I gotta assimilate to all America and it's tough. I gotta eat my sandwhich with mayo AND keep hot sauce in my bag. All while folks be telling me what new Asian food is trendy and want to talk to me about Anime and Video Games.
I here you. This is a place where we can rise up, rise up!
Yes, let the socialists come to power for once.
I dislike mayo but Wes Anderson is my favorite director
Mayonnaise is a WMD
Is this a four year strong reference
Cuz when we team up team up
Together we can burn this place the ground
And then there's a sick breakdown
I still know every word of that song
I was actually referencing Hamilton. Ha.
Make me a mod, it'll he the same as Dom's policies except authoritarians also get banned and the default avatar changes into that pic of stirner
When I become a mod, I'm changing my avatar to this:
Moderation is a spook
All I'm going to say is we saw what happened when anarchists lead the charge in Catalonia.;)
Authoritarian communists betray them and allow fascism to rise?
The CNT was in control of much of Republican Spain and had power in its hands. In the Catalan capital of Barcelona, the leaders of the CNT-FAI were called into the offices of Luis Companys, head of the regional government. There Companys told them, "Today you are masters of the city and of Catalonia.... You have conquered and everything is in your power; if you do not need or want me as president of Catalonia, tell me now."35
"The delegates of the CNT were surprised by this frank admission: "He saw the situation more clearly than us because he hadn’t been in the thick of the street fighting. One of us replied, ‘We have come to no decision about this, consequently we cannot give an answer. We would have to return and report to the CNT.’"36
The choice was posed clearly: Either the CNT would overthrow the old government and establish a revolutionary government in Catalonia, or the Popular Front would remain in power and slowly strangle both the revolution and the fight against Franco. The CNT, however, was not prepared for the choice.
On July 23, the Catalan Regional Committee of the CNT-FAI called a meeting to discuss whether to overthrow the Catalan government. Initially, FAI leader Juan García Oliver, who later entered the national government as minister of justice, argued to "go for everything," overthrow the government and establish libertarian communism. If the government were overthrown, however, it would have to be replaced by a workers’ government led by the CNT-FAI. The anarchists believed any such state would be a dictatorship, a mortal blow to their anti-statist principles. Federica Montseny argued that "her conscience as an anarchist would not permit her to accept...to go for everything as García Oliver proposed, because the installation of an anarchist dictatorship, because it was a dictatorship, could never be anarchist."37 And Mariano Vázquez, the regional secretary of the Catalan CNT, opposed "compromising the Organization [CNT] in dictatorial practices."38"
Just to let y'all know, when the time comes I will betray whoever to take power for myself.
We're getting in the weeds here, Ben. Lets focus on seizing power now.
If the government were overthrown, however, it would have to be replaced by a workers’ government led by the CNT-FAI.
International Socialist Review
Now let us get down to business. First, how can we stop Nate from betraying us.
Sorry I agree but I can't resist the joke:
What so u can Kronstadt me
What would Lenin say
"Nate is too coarse and this defect, although quite tolerable in our midst and in dealing among us Communists, becomes intolerable in a Secretary-General. That is why I suggest that the comrades think about a way of removing Nate from that post and appointing another person in his stead who in all other respects differs from Comrade Nate in having only one advantage, namely, that of being more tolerant, more loyal, more polite and more considerate to the comrades, less capricious, etc."