Remove ads, unlock a dark mode theme, and get other perks by upgrading your account. Experience the website the way it's meant to be.
  1. Sponsor: Sweet Time Announce New album
    The new music video for Sweet Time’s “More Than Ever” is out now and streaming on all platforms.
    Dismiss Notice

Pinegrove - Skylight (September 28, 2018) Album • Page 37

Discussion in 'Music Forum' started by cwhit, Sep 27, 2017.

  1. atlas

    Trusted

    yeah i don't fuck with this at all. Sending this message to abusers that genuinely want to acknowledge they fucked up and wbe accountable for their wrongdoing is not good. You're telling them that they will never be able to resume their artistic life in any sort of public sense and only encouraging them to continue hiding from what they've done. redemption shouldn't be impossible.

    obviously by redemption I mean actually going through some level of accountability process in accordance with the wishes of their victim and not putting out some half assed non-apology on FB so they can continue their career as usual
     
  2. Kennedy

    loomasleep.bandcamp.com Prestigious

    i think this is an important thing to consider
     
  3. leerkat

    relentlessly nosy bastard

    Yall are really out there being like "but what about the POOR abuser who has clearly no intention to rehabilitate himself or go through with an actual accountability process??? what about him!!!! we need to comfort him and make all kinds of accomodations should another shitty dude also be outed so that they don't feel saaaaad and excluuuuded". Wow boy do I have news for you guys about how victims feel! You don't equate a victim's wellbeing and recovery with an abuser's rehabilitation & reintegration. They're not on the same plan of importance. Check yourselves. This thread is just wildly offensive all round.
     
    Carrow likes this.
  4. Jason Tate Mar 14, 2018
    (Last edited: Mar 14, 2018)
    Public life, career, and praise is a privilege. Not a right. Redemption doesn’t mean you get to keep making art and be a celebrity. That’s not what restorative justice is about. Those that actually seek it know that.

    I’m completely fine saying that “public” life should be over for those that greatly abuse its power. Celebrity is toxic. “Redemption” is personal, celebrity the antithesis of that.
     
  5. If the worst consequence someone faces is no longer being able to play in a mediocre band for people they’ll be just fine. (And it’s clear our society is just fine pretending nothing happened a few years later anyway.)
     
    leerkat and Anthony_ like this.
  6. Kennedy

    loomasleep.bandcamp.com Prestigious

    I don’t get why I got this response to be honest, I was just backing the point that I don’t want artists who have done wrong to keep hiding it and brushing it under the rug. By no means am I defending wrong doings of artists. I want them to be expose themselves where appropriate.
     
  7. Kennedy Mar 14, 2018
    (Last edited: Mar 15, 2018)
    Kennedy

    loomasleep.bandcamp.com Prestigious

    I really don’t think anyone in here said this.
     
  8. Because the part you quoted included, “You're telling them that they will never be able to resume their artistic life in any sort of public sense”
     
  9. Kennedy

    loomasleep.bandcamp.com Prestigious

    the later part of the sentence is the part I was thinking was interesting, not really that part
     
    fenway89 likes this.
  10. atlas

    Trusted

    This is not even remotely close to what I said, whatsoever. The victim's wellbeing and recovery are absolutely the most important thing whenever an abusive situation occurs. There should be no reintegration of any kind until that is ironed out first. If the victim communicates with their abuser and believes that they will still go out and continue abusing despite whatever reparations they've tried to make, tough shit dude, don't try to revive your career. If the victim does not feel comfortable communicating with their abuser and still feels at risk, same thing.

    Take the Malcolm London/Bled Fest thing. Even though he was held accountable within his own artistic community (which is sadly almost never going to happen in genres of music dominated by white dudes that never hold themselves accountable) and his victim came out and personally said that she would be OK with him performing, enough survivors attending the fest spoke out feeling unsafe about his inclusion, and pulling him from the lineup was the right decision.

    Regarding this particular situation, if Evan/Pinegrove are actively going against the wishes of who Evan abused so he/they can continue the band, then they can fuck right off and don't deserve anybody's support. Unfortunately that seems like that's going to be the case.
     
    leerkat and cwhit like this.
  11. K. I was responding to what you quoted as being important. I disagree.
     
  12. atlas

    Trusted

    looking at it again the way I worded the original post comes off as insensitive to the victims bc it gives too much weight to the importance of the abuser's career. That's my bad
     
    leerkat likes this.
  13. SamLevi11

    Prestigious Prestigious

    I feel like there's an awful lot of assumptions going on here, unless you all know something I don't? Cause I still don't know what even happened...
     
    LTF likes this.
  14. OhTheWater

    Let it run Supporter

    Read through the Accountability thread
     
  15. cwhit

    still emperor emo Prestigious

    one last post, for now.

    i feel like there is a big difference between negative action and inaction. negative action to me is what nandi did: throwing public support behind an abuser and saying that she'd always support him. regardless of what's happening behind the scenes and how much she knows, to victims who don't know details it just seems like full support. and that's not right. i don't blame her completely because the publication should have known better than bait her into a question about the situation, but i'm still very uncomfortable with how she said what she did, and i'm curious to see if she tweets something clarifying that today

    phoebe however, didn't actually do anything but post something about her upcoming tour. you have to remember that we still live surrounded by capitalism, and for an overseas tour where all the details about her tourmate weren't set in stone, as well as tons of management control i'm sure, it's much harder to drop a tour at that point without totally blowing up your own career. i don't see anything she did as supportive of evan, and i just wish we could have a little nuance about how this works in the industry as well as understanding the world we live in

    however, after reading over my posts i now realize i was veering into policing in that regard, and i apologize. of course people can be mad with phoebe or kevdev or whoever for whatever reasons, i'm just always someone who'd prefer a realistic approach when it comes to people who haven't directly supporting abusers after they have been outed. all abusers are bad, but i think we need to be careful about who gets caught in the crossfire. why do we need to focus on people that truly haven't thrown support behind abusive people publicly? however as i said, people can definitely hold what feelings they have and again i apologize if it ever felt like i was trying to push people away from their own feelings
     
  16. SamLevi11

    Prestigious Prestigious

    That's a big thread and I don't really have the time to look at it all but I'll just look it up another day.
     
  17. OhTheWater

    Let it run Supporter

    It’s all within the past day. Worth looking at if you’re confused about people making assumptions
     
  18. jorbjorb

    7 rings Prestigious

    They shouldn't be releasing any more material. Bummer.
     
  19. OotyPa

    fall away Supporter

    I've tossed the idea in my head for a bit, but how would people feel if they continued as a band without Evan? I know he was like the primary songwriter, but I can see myself feeling more comfortable returning to them without him as frontman.
     
  20. cwhit

    still emperor emo Prestigious

    it wouldn't be pinegrove, pinegrove is pretty much evan's project with a band
     
  21. Stephen Young

    Regular Prestigious

    I believe Pinegrove is almost a solo project- I know his live lineup has changed a few times, but it wouldn't make sense to have Pinegrove without Evan.
     
  22. RedDotRecording

    Record Engineer/Producer. Musician. Coffee Punk.

    Sprucegrove?

    Sorry. I just read through most of this thread and my brain is numb for anything other than bad puns.
     
  23. Carrow

    maybe this time, I won't be alright Supporter

    Evan Stephens Hall should stay the fuck away from this scene if he knows what's good for him. Fuck him and fuck Half Waif.
     
    leerkat likes this.
  24. primavera

    big baller brand Supporter

    8C072387-1CF3-4C8F-A35D-6826CE3D3FE0.jpeg
     
  25. LTF

    Newbie

    Love how this is insinuating Pinegrove is now just some mediocre band. *eye roll*

    Can't wait for the reviews that pan their new album when it's released too. If you can't talk honestly about a band or an artist you might as well not talk about them at all.
     
    Carrow likes this.