I’m a boring guy that doesn’t rate anything. My brain would get too hung up on the “right” rating and make using the app less fun for me. If I love it I’ll throw a heart on it
Ah man, do you need Patron for that and not Pro? I tried to upgrade my membership and shocker, it's way harder than you'd think.
I don’t rate things because it’d drive me crazy being internally consistent, though I’m very aware that literally nobody other than me would pay attention.
I love rating shit but I don't really put that much thought into it, just whatever feels right in the moment. I give the hearts to anything that gets 4.5 or 5 stars
HEART if I enjoyed watching it (good or bad), five if it's perfect for me, 4.5 if it's great, 4 if it could be, 3.5 if it's good, 3 if it's more good than not, and varying degrees of "bad" below that for me I wind up giving a lot of hearts and 4s because I just like watching movies so much.
I only rate things once; sometimes I’ll go amend a rating upon rewatch. My most common rating is probably 3.5. I reserve 5 stars for movies that rewire my DNA.
Yeah. Starting with Spinal Tap. Watch that like 5 more times so you begin to realize how wrong only 2.5 stars is. K thanks.
my brother in christ you gave The Emoji Movie a higher score than Spider-Man 2, one of the only superhero films that actually justifies its existence
quick question: how do y'all approach rating/reviewing stuff you've previously seen but aren't simply watching for the first time or rewatching? do you forego adding a date or do you try to estimate when you first watched it?
Anything I saw before using Letterboxd I just marked as watched, not logged or rated. Anything I’ve watched while having/using Letterboxd gets logged and rated; if it’s something I’ve seen before, it gets marked as a rewatch.
part of me thinks this might be the way to go, but i'm also tempted to write reviews for my four favorites just because i'd love to talk about them but don't know the next chance i'm gonna get to watch them. i might leave those ones undated.