Remove ads, unlock a dark mode theme, and get other perks by upgrading your account. Experience the website the way it's meant to be.

How Avenged Sevenfold’s Lawsuit Could Upend Record Deals Everywhere

Discussion in 'Article Discussion' started by Melody Bot, Aug 28, 2017.

  1. Melody Bot

    Your friendly little forum bot. Staff Member

    This article has been imported from chorus.fm for discussion. All of the forum rules still apply.

    Eriq Gardner, writing for The Hollywood Reporter:


    What’s a record label actually good for? That is a question implied in a lawsuit between Warner Bros. Records and Avenged Sevenfold, a heavy metal band from Huntington Beach, California, that is scheduled to go to trial this year and has the potential to upend the music industry.

    The dispute dates back to 2015, when the act notified its label that it was terminating the contract it signed in 2004, citing the “seven-year rule,” which bars personal service contracts lasting longer than seven years. The law has its roots in a pro-labor statute put on the books after the Civil War to prevent long-term contracts from becoming the means for involuntary servitude. The modern version of the rule was famously tested in entertainment in 1944, when Olivia de Havilland used the law to break her contract with Warner Bros after the studio repeatedly suspended her for turning down roles. An appeals court decision helped bring an end to Hollywood’s old studio system.

     
  2. The Format

    Regular

    A contract can't exceed 7 years? If only this applied to mortgages:crylaugh:
     
    aniafc likes this.
  3. Behind the Barricade

    https://www.behindthecade.com

    ...and student loans!
     
    aniafc likes this.
  4. tomtom94

    Trusted

    Tony Brummel is sweating.