I’m really failing to see how this isn’t the case, so I’d sincerely appreciate it if you’d share your opinion on why you think it isn’t.
If Bran can Warg a dragon though, he probably should have done it when Drogon was leveling King’s Landing?
Tyrion’s speech about why Bran should be king felt like D&D staring at “Bran becomes king” on the list of plot bullet points GRRM gave them and not being able to come up with any reason for why it should happen other than it would be a good story and they just decided to make that the official reason in the show
I took the last shot to be a clear indication that he's joining Tormund and living north of the wall. But again, they purposefully left it ambiguous.
Loved Dany making that speech in a foreign language, loved Tyrion's scene with Jon just after he's arrested. Still think Dany's downfall was a little to expedited which made it all a little bit hollow, especially her death, and it should have felt more like a tragedy
Remember when I laughed and said Edmure might not as well exist a few days ago and then Sansa made it canon?
That was one of the greatest pieces of fan service in the series. Up there with "thought you might still be rowing"
A pretty consistent theme in the entire show is the importance and power of story. Going back to season one we see Sansa acting on stories of what the court should be like. And old Nan telling stories that drive how Jon and Arya act. The stories behind the Rains of Castamere build legends. The white walkers were just a story, etc. Tyrion’s not incorrect that narrative drives action in the masses. We’ve seen what false narratives have driven actionwise in the last two years alone here.
Wasn't the first scene of the whole series some Wildings running away from some WW beyond the wall? And the final scene is the Wildlings walking back out there. Liked that.