Remove ads, unlock a dark mode theme, and get other perks by upgrading your account. Experience the website the way it's meant to be.

Condé Nast to Put All Titles Behind Paywalls by Year End

Discussion in 'Article Discussion' started by Melody Bot, Jan 23, 2019.

  1. Melody Bot

    Your friendly little forum bot. Staff Member

    This article has been imported from chorus.fm for discussion. All of the forum rules still apply.

    The Wall Street Journal:


    Magazine publisher Condé Nast said it would put all its titles behind paywalls by the end of the year, as pressure builds on major publishers to generate more revenue beyond advertising.

    I am curious to see what they do with Pitchfork.

     
  2. Steve_JustAGuy

    Trusted

    I sure wouldn't pay for Pitchfork on it's own, but if it was bundled with other stuff maybe?
     
  3. Orla

    right on!

    Here also wondering what happens with P4k. I do visit the site almost daily, but I’ve never thought about how much I value it in terms of dollars I’d be willing to spend on its content.
     
  4. Arry

    it was all a dream Prestigious

    NOT BON APPETIT!!! I love their youtube channel, but now I can see them putting exclusives behind a paywall..
     
  5. Craig Manning

    @FurtherFromSky Moderator

    Would anyone pay for Pitchfork? I definitely wouldn't pay for Pitchfork.
     
    Matt Chylak, K0ta and Merve like this.
  6. This post is a 3.6. No BNP.
     
  7. Craig Manning

    @FurtherFromSky Moderator

    Wow, rave review! I was expecting more of a Jet - Shine On kind of review.

     
    Steve_JustAGuy likes this.
  8. dubey

    Regular

    Pitchfork (in its current state) dies behind a paywall
     
  9. Drew Beringer

    @drewberinger Moderator

     
  10. K0ta

    wrap yourself in petals for armor.

    Why do I need Pitchfork when I have chorus.fm
     
  11. Carrow

    Japanese Bonus Track

    [​IMG]