He's listed at 15 15. Patrick Kane, Chicago Blackhawks. One of the best offensive players this decade. His problems off the ice will always detract from that and be a part of his story Seems like they're in a lose lose situation....put him in the top 10 you get yelled at for glorifying an accused rapist (all while this roenick stuff is happening) or leave him out and get mocked for putting him behind players with zero cups.
Wysh has him at #9... The top 100 NHL players of the decade "Kane will end the 2010s as the decade's leading scorer in total points, although his points-per-game average (1.08) ranks him fourth overall. He's the best right wing of the decade..."
If Seabrook ever returns he will be like Robocop. Let’s just hope that he quits professional sports for his own sake.
Not sure if we’re allowed to post links, but hockeydabeast streams are via youtube and super solid: Hockeydabeast413
On the Kane stuff... based off of what he accomplished the past decade I don’t know how he isn’t in the top 5 on every list. My personal list would have him at 3. Most points, most cups, several trophies. He also lit it up in the playoffs in each of the Hawks cup years... and he’s pretty much a PPG contributor in general in the playoffs. Also, Seabrook situation sounds like the Hawks are finding another way out of a bad contract lol. I find that while Detroit has also taken advantage of the LTIRetirement, it’s incredibly frustrating for me to watch teams continuously sign players to long term deals that age horribly and then have them find some reason to retire early and not have to deal with it. I think I brought it up earlier and a lot of people disagreed with me, but I don’t think it should be this easy for any team to get out of a cap hit when a guy retires early or even is just out with a big injury. I’d love for the league to change the system so less of the cap hit is wiped out for injuries or early retirements.