Remove ads, unlock a dark mode theme, and get other perks by upgrading your account. Experience the website the way it's meant to be.

2017-2018 Fantasy Football Discussion [Archived] Football • Page 27

Discussion in 'Sports Forum' started by Deathco_019, Aug 27, 2017.

Thread Status:
This thread is locked and not open for further replies.
  1. GrantCloud

    Prestigious Prestigious

    Guy I’m playing and I put a wager on our match, Gurley has given me like p good lead.
     
  2. Drew Baldy

    Trusted

    Is Markus Wheaton worth picking up if you have no depth at WR?
     
  3. theagentcoma

    yeah good okay Prestigious

    Cool Rams D got me 2 points
     
  4. y2jayjk

    Trusted Prestigious

    Fuck Sammy Watkins
     
    Whatjuliansaid likes this.
  5. Deathco_019

    Drummer

    I started Hyde in one league and then saw I had to go against Watkins. Started Garcon in another that I saw I'm going up against Gurley in.

    God damn it
     
  6. Full Effect Ed

    ...In F*cking Full Effect Prestigious

    Should I start Tampa Bay’s D against Minnesota or Pittsburgh against Chicago?

    Decisions, decisions...anyone’s $.02 would be awesome!
     
  7. xbrokendownx

    Lets Go. Prestigious

    definitely Pittsburgh IMO, especially if Bradford plays
     
  8. Deathco_019

    Drummer

    Pitt
     
    Full Effect Ed likes this.
  9. Full Effect Ed

    ...In F*cking Full Effect Prestigious

    Thanks guys, I was leaning towards Pitt too
     
  10. Donnie Ruth

    Trusted Supporter

    For my flex I'm trying to decide between J. Rodgers vs. the Vikings or Cohen vs. Pittsburgh.
     
  11. Buck Allen or Devante Adams ?
     
  12. xbrokendownx

    Lets Go. Prestigious

    I'd play Quizz. They feed him the ball when Martin is not in there.

    Buck if its PPR
     
    Donnie Ruth likes this.
  13. Max_123

    Nope. Prestigious

    Need a flex standard scoring

    J Stew
    Buck Allen
    K Benjamin
    Parker
     
  14. Deathco_019

    Drummer

    I would go Benjamin
     
  15. Whatjuliansaid

    News on once the clouds are gone. Prestigious

    Started Goff and gurley but not Watkins, ugh. I guarantee when I start him next time he'll put up a big 0.
     
  16. ncarrab

    Prestigious Supporter

    Melvin Gordon is now questionable this week?
     
  17. It's definitely PPR.
     
  18. Sean Murphy

    Prestigious Supporter

    bradford out again

    struggling with benching thielen and starting Alvin Kamara or Chris Carson
     
  19. ClarettsGreyGoose

    I wish I had changed my user name... Prestigious

    Is it PPR or standard? If it's standard I'd play Carson. He is absolutely going to get the volume and should be like a low end RB2, where as you have no idea what you will get from Thielen with Bradford out, or from Kamara on a week to week basis.
     
  20. ClarettsGreyGoose

    I wish I had changed my user name... Prestigious

    The smell of QB desperation: snagging Bradford this morning when he cleared waivers, dropping Corey Coleman from my IR slot and moving Bradford there when he was declared out and then picking up Andy Dalton and hoping for a bounce back with the new OC. One of those two and Wilson has to become startable right?
     
  21. chcougar1

    Trusted

    My championship winning dynasty team is going to start 0-3. David Johnson to IR and now Gordon questionable. Ayiyi
     
  22. Drew Baldy

    Trusted

    Eifert is my only tight end. Should I pick up cook or Watson?
     
  23. GrantCloud

    Prestigious Prestigious

    i was in the same situation, picked up zach miller. but if you pick up either of them i would say cook, carr spreads the ball around a bit.
     
  24. GrantCloud

    Prestigious Prestigious

    pretty tempted to start goff next week, wilson and mariota haven't done that well so far this year.
     
  25. ClarettsGreyGoose

    I wish I had changed my user name... Prestigious

    Cook is the hot streaming guy for this week according to all the analysts but..he's still Jared Cook
     
Thread Status:
This thread is locked and not open for further replies.